|
|
Question:36 - 27854
" c; J x6 c; |. u% a2 bWhich of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:
$ z* c0 {; w7 _, a7 FA)- D! Q, \: g2 E/ o
provide managers greater job security.
9 o' i3 ~: Y8 N& _B)# K$ g$ V, T7 b3 ?! u4 j
may start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.! e3 @) m8 z, O! `) v$ {1 a
C)
. g. T- r1 G+ y- Kchange the firm’s legal status from public to private.
$ M1 {4 N+ i" \$ R/ E3 \9 SD)$ z- X! Y8 k$ G8 Z1 I
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.. X9 D" h+ [2 e J6 k/ p3 Z; j
Question:37 - 27901- D% J3 A2 G1 b" S Y1 O
Which of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
- Z* Q& X: }8 ^" Z( W; W$ ^3 Q; gA)8 R) p* E, R0 y
Political obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.
- P1 r: |3 V3 K5 U8 Y3 V1 DB)
/ d& Z& ~3 q: FManagement can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.2 ]; c' c7 U" y$ D9 w' M2 U' B) j& \8 E
C)
1 s1 Z7 W3 d& a' V4 i& PThe firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.
- P$ ` k$ I/ `+ M" B ^D). e' l. h0 `: l+ Y$ W& ?
The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.
$ S; ]- H. v& v1 h+ c* v2 Y9 e# A2 Y- Z. @/ M! { i
Question:38 - 9865$ Q' K( c2 a6 R4 |3 B9 c
Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be: ?' m& K" j7 w+ [3 H# A
A)
, G4 G/ d$ |' M ^5 Z( V9 qtoo low.2 N* Z9 E. N. ~+ [3 O
B)5 r' d+ |, u, j8 j& `4 M0 ^; A
can't tell from this information.
+ V q# `6 t9 o4 n0 h- m0 iC)' M1 `3 x- ^2 |0 V; D. X* N
too high.0 Q6 v8 e8 J2 ]3 |5 T' V9 L
D)
V/ o @5 S0 O: C7 U9 m, lvery accurate.
' [0 F7 F$ ~, W, @3 ?. ?8 i
( C7 ~; h+ P# |( u3 \ I( k
/ k$ z3 Y- P5 ?- F( U1 |: hQuestion:39 - 9849* ~' {7 Q$ [9 f9 I Z' f
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
" V% w1 G( V. } {A)
4 X2 e7 {* D5 n3 ], v. u3 jrelative value.
( n6 A1 U0 Y# t( V' J& PB)
& u6 V# s+ F/ r4 n$ P6 |" Wfuture value.. z+ K) ? ~' i1 J4 @8 q
C)4 W* _( ^; C+ E! z7 f6 v& G3 N
intrinsic value.* n) T7 @. B" q: F" H6 [
D)5 e) G4 Y* J/ K5 X0 q. ~( ~
market value.7 d: {% w' B* t) C4 j
2 }1 a3 Z4 L7 }, Z0 H* P5 YQuestion:40 - 9947, B, E; [* s) N3 j. S
Roger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?
3 ^8 C" e/ R) F7 ]+ N9 d$ i" kA)
- I4 `( ?' e0 C5 E7 Y/ SAn 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.3 {8 r- q/ H( H. a
B)& p- b/ h: H5 b6 r& G
An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
3 ^/ }* ]3 M2 VC)
7 u0 l" l! y2 @Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.
* m0 E& O/ s& x4 LD)- ]8 W1 X1 [0 F3 J
The market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
, \8 |+ t- T5 m% \ |
|