|
|
Question:36 - 27854( y \: h0 ~. m
Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:0 V! |2 M5 U# ~$ d1 H% r V" q6 o T; s
A)9 V% t. P% t M' H
provide managers greater job security.
" L* {$ {9 X( {) @( QB)
0 ~' U; v, t1 Emay start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.6 u- f- r9 Q* e/ m6 ?# w
C)0 Z2 a# f( W8 d. c, P! i
change the firm’s legal status from public to private.1 ?% g) W2 f" ]8 x3 L
D)* a9 t; F3 I$ `3 N: z. x
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.
( K1 v7 u: Q, |4 t2 H* A) J z" K' i( k3 gQuestion:37 - 27901
2 g8 A. ^; j# g9 jWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
+ y- C, v" m$ b9 y9 }6 ?) p& xA)
! I% W" E, P; t# SPolitical obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.
/ x# a7 l5 d/ s/ _1 @* HB)# d9 H' H2 ^. T4 ^' A2 O! t$ `, c
Management can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.( h* G7 e+ c5 U+ V1 A: f3 F* b7 F9 ?
C)9 s% {+ e2 l+ f$ |, H
The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.
# F5 V' ]9 O, q* SD)
( {/ B" b: K fThe firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.; P( c$ V7 u; A; [3 |3 {
& P) k/ X/ x* ^Question:38 - 9865# S/ W& t9 Z8 ]. @; t1 I+ F# A
Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:- H9 l' ^/ e* Y( \' a
A)
( }6 Q8 f+ W- y' g! }0 Z" Ptoo low.
' p" ]9 a; w/ C' f( yB)5 O: t" _ b* i: ?5 x1 n4 y
can't tell from this information.
2 e; k- U4 p7 r( b6 g' G" l. h& VC)
9 A) G8 D; Y, ftoo high.- A* A2 A& U+ Y2 E! F" o
D)& ^+ X: ~0 R, d, {
very accurate.
# J: f# ?7 L; \; M
! {4 P- H4 Y6 C7 F5 A1 w3 K) ~8 \
* Y2 }& k6 t* n$ Q# v! m8 fQuestion:39 - 98495 u( ]& b/ V- d4 n, F/ G) s
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
& u) p5 I% \8 \+ X. NA)
: ?, I' |% ]/ l( ^; W- M9 I" I0 qrelative value.
2 G; ^' Y$ _* ~+ T9 u$ ^B); x: s( E1 C& d' P7 B
future value.+ N8 U: c; Y F. U. R
C). D- l& ^. M d K
intrinsic value.$ H$ e* a% r2 A4 u L
D)
& N4 w& \5 I+ P5 f: gmarket value.
+ J2 k: n$ G5 W# u5 b- _2 h; |7 l1 y* _5 D1 {4 X
Question:40 - 9947
/ i* x, R- ?! u" RRoger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?$ Z# v8 p$ A* K- S7 L' ]6 ]& ^/ E
A)
% v d5 S) ~: e: p( MAn 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.6 M+ ^: ?! r" C. B; Y# F
B)
K2 {/ h0 z' ?" ^An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.8 B! _2 |. ]! w
C)
% U* g) q. c& |: F1 v4 m/ P, EMarket share goals are not a competitive strategy.
( E1 h+ A+ k- N3 h2 f) C# JD)
0 p( {1 z7 ^: R7 j8 r% v; fThe market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
6 g* j U. r' M5 D" s |
|