|
|
Question:36 - 27854$ \% Y) o" p" D5 z
Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:6 c& i4 T3 i2 W- J6 c: E
A)
/ X0 \! ?! S% S* Kprovide managers greater job security.
t- c+ _' `! Y' }9 mB)
+ C4 t3 J$ y( cmay start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.
7 g _4 U) z0 x# {& r: IC)4 x9 _# |. ^/ x ?: o9 U' \
change the firm’s legal status from public to private.
# q- @3 c" G I& U. A! s5 G6 VD)
3 f) R% w/ u$ i7 U. q% v) Mforce the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.6 s, U y6 _- h4 }$ i; j# S
Question:37 - 27901% |8 `& M, b* a5 Y- G3 r( A
Which of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
4 ]7 ?- i* M$ [& o9 p8 ?A)
- z6 L S0 y: e4 C {Political obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.; l& Q$ t! U' E% `, f
B)1 q. ^( t Q4 ?0 P! q6 |
Management can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.( v& a8 R$ m0 [/ `
C)* ?- l) ~$ |) l6 ~
The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.% L! w9 B8 V" Q4 ~5 L$ ]
D)$ S! N9 E5 f1 E; j8 B
The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.9 w6 K5 \! o& t! p( r* t
' s: J. B7 s! S3 n& VQuestion:38 - 9865
- a+ J. G0 q% L; W( W2 d8 o+ YOverestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:
& R9 u; T3 D) o& g3 A3 E3 v$ B6 i4 nA) g, a6 D1 p! S7 g9 S
too low.# [& ?( j/ [5 u: k; }4 e
B)" g! Y5 [) \. t, O$ }
can't tell from this information.
6 Q" ^) M7 X/ BC), G% f$ q; U6 D0 c; m
too high.1 H! y7 j& G% M$ G* g
D)9 T& T4 i x2 K% L2 G
very accurate.
/ c5 [/ `' N1 f& z
! M0 R2 l) b$ O8 [4 e* y: a6 n, ]6 b) @
Question:39 - 9849& X# ]& Y) e- \. d1 h& {5 G- O
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
6 Z0 C: t8 Q; [, \8 lA)) D9 H: |- q( V1 N7 ^
relative value.
& C8 n# ?& S2 K+ z7 s& TB)7 E" B, E2 Q8 [; C8 Y/ T- t6 T. _
future value.2 M- E% X' U( e2 B2 t
C)% f0 G" z- J5 P9 O
intrinsic value.
- y$ j5 T% v8 C+ S1 N2 PD)
6 ?0 R2 t* _# G) ^# T6 Y: W$ w( Fmarket value.
! F) @( L& s- S) z
4 P& e X. R& j" \Question:40 - 99475 Y* ]5 R% v+ g3 f
Roger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?
1 T% H' X# j6 `! mA)
7 f2 |3 j9 ?4 a; J9 F7 C3 ]6 tAn 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
! H; P. B `1 K5 n6 h; i; MB)9 {, I- I; P4 N4 T9 x0 A" n
An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
7 }9 [* F" f! f$ p7 q( i+ V- L1 kC)
2 d& O V- c- W$ H5 J: QMarket share goals are not a competitive strategy.1 P3 ]3 @, [+ c' U4 J( ?
D)
( P y* @1 \' ]: {The market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
% Y% A. [8 f/ |! M. C |
|