|
|
Question:36 - 278543 L9 A1 I# i! g( i2 N
Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:
( e- ?! A- o4 `- m5 ^& |A)
1 x. ]* l5 U$ x% \4 hprovide managers greater job security.: k6 D9 a8 b+ Y& L- a
B)
6 @- o' x8 T: P! s) mmay start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.
1 w7 z: r1 ^* e# f! V! FC)5 \" Y6 f4 s7 e" N7 I) W. w5 U* B& p2 ]
change the firm’s legal status from public to private.
" Z- B" e* e7 c% b" Y4 wD)) |6 S6 h( v; J8 U
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.+ v6 Q/ {8 S( X3 y
Question:37 - 27901
2 N8 a- |$ @) ]. E' Z2 wWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
8 `$ }3 J) ~' v" N! NA)0 o5 \4 J | [) M! j, Q& S
Political obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.6 _! p" t) C# n
B)! p( |5 b0 G+ U, i9 l
Management can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.7 F2 l( `$ f. B& _" T5 l- Y
C)
( A1 {( d- B6 E3 c+ VThe firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.+ ?! V$ ~ C6 z6 m3 c
D)" Q+ V: w0 K+ U8 v) n& [
The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.
7 o* c1 f; B* g$ S& d, _6 g( {/ V
, o+ m" B$ d/ J& [Question:38 - 9865# Z3 ]7 }* V+ k1 P( o
Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:
) U; f. K7 F2 Q- y, u5 yA)
' C3 u( o E+ ?6 Z! gtoo low.
) z2 U# J! Z8 ]% S1 z% _5 z6 VB)0 q* J% i, @( D; K$ u
can't tell from this information.- o0 C0 \; Q4 j" A' B
C)8 `8 a# w+ S) \9 j5 H1 S
too high.& r; a7 C/ ?3 |
D)8 o0 m! L% S1 \& E
very accurate.( b9 B* i! N R+ ?5 s K
( p1 A: O- c& J# n' }
+ y3 d8 C* E- c
Question:39 - 9849
8 M, w6 s& A/ B5 R8 A' kThe goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
8 M4 [- E6 q3 `A)
2 M7 @2 w. H9 N, Q: xrelative value.
& s" [8 J, I* G- BB)
C2 ]- ^5 i2 r- x/ dfuture value.4 [8 D ~/ K9 O/ V9 f' b3 b
C)
6 Q; i$ m( T% |! d5 C9 \intrinsic value.: ^5 X- S/ t6 N
D)
5 a) ]/ j4 C) a% P# ~: Jmarket value.
: M. _4 e! ?* C) T8 W2 Q. W3 U- v$ C# v* \4 K2 C% n
Question:40 - 9947
( p1 r1 j+ u2 c. pRoger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?/ [# k0 O7 Y0 W
A)
8 s" u) r, u* n/ l M, R+ T# E$ tAn 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.7 ]. `1 a8 _+ j& I8 s& g0 m y
B)! J9 G k5 m1 ]; z
An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.' P4 j/ B$ F& [
C)
" E9 _' m: w: x9 y, r$ jMarket share goals are not a competitive strategy.2 j6 x, |/ f5 T; d3 Z
D)
7 f" `) R2 k) i, I$ }7 h1 n) KThe market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.! n4 Y2 `; q* }7 m' k+ ^
|
|