|
|
Question:36 - 27854" L5 K# h4 p% {: d7 m
Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:
9 q$ o! v8 x- o- L+ `" uA)
$ T f' F* y8 r6 `; |+ Q Mprovide managers greater job security.
( s l' Y+ D0 }$ RB)8 h6 j( B9 ?4 H* h
may start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.1 F6 B( G7 U% x6 l1 W& m' t2 o# l. [
C)
B# m. @7 E( Y) _4 I/ y% m1 h1 Kchange the firm’s legal status from public to private.
( Z" x+ n6 t1 h0 bD)
\# u3 u# m5 |- Cforce the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.
3 u8 u9 P; C1 j m4 _Question:37 - 27901
) N4 A+ v: p+ i. L# u* QWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
8 [" c8 ~# e: R" H0 \( _A)) P: Q7 F% c( b* O
Political obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.$ U3 k5 J4 L( K4 }
B)+ s/ r: I6 [! W$ C% }2 R
Management can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.+ J* N0 `' _" F
C)9 Z9 r- y y. b6 P' ^2 J
The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.
: H3 e# w+ T$ K9 L B; tD)
/ C" r+ ~: t+ R9 H3 Y, X: Y3 v6 cThe firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.
, |9 @' `# T, f8 F: d. ~# x W, a0 g7 X% F& j
Question:38 - 9865
1 S! W$ A# k: X5 E3 R1 F6 `Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:9 C! n8 g* A3 u! U9 C( g3 l3 r
A)
2 ~) y: b7 }* l/ gtoo low." }* E4 A7 ?: X* w2 y; l! k: k; |
B)# [! ~1 b! S) M, a$ K
can't tell from this information., l) ^" A2 ?; s, w6 {" j& W
C)
2 {: C: i0 S B5 n L3 \too high.
$ n: T/ i# i$ W5 W# ?D) J! H) ]' f1 S4 `
very accurate.
7 C: n, A( {5 c2 _
$ `% j" V" W9 I% n2 X+ K2 N3 f0 p l$ \2 J& Y
Question:39 - 9849
! h2 g) W* f: Q+ n; z4 n' ?2 eThe goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
! z L& N! y6 q+ j2 bA)
4 t. f0 C% a: Brelative value. k. a( y, |; S
B)) @. t" K1 I1 R% m# l
future value.
' ]$ r4 d" j: f2 e+ iC)
. \6 n' W. ` G' ]/ k# c- Pintrinsic value.) O5 S$ f4 d5 ^1 k6 ^$ B
D)
4 P, _' y3 A" P2 J% [- v3 C, M& pmarket value.- z6 G6 Z, P( t/ G! N
) ?) R1 o% o4 |/ @9 i
Question:40 - 9947
: e6 `, X+ h1 b7 l: i. i3 B8 S$ t$ p8 PRoger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?
+ e+ S# v+ r% U7 v/ lA)& a, j. r- j/ ^- B/ x. s! q
An 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.6 K/ i# R: h" b
B)
0 R5 G' i2 Y, H/ j0 Y t% ?* A: b( OAn 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
1 X5 w' @ r& H4 G' c) U' JC)2 V) c* A, e, O6 k
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.% q# P0 ]4 ^' R
D)
/ ?' b2 Q8 L; }5 x! yThe market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.3 r& ?+ }3 k. c* Q& s6 [
|
|