|
|
Question:36 - 27854
1 F& D* m0 P% T4 C, n! iWhich of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:
! e* g5 `$ C* m* b! y$ K, YA)
: b( x' u( i! }0 y1 [ _+ I: Xprovide managers greater job security./ E: G u4 K N& R" s9 n3 r2 O
B), c0 ~. `1 U' |
may start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.
. d& z; s. {& M1 G1 W- d3 CC)
$ I& c% I! u3 H4 p4 rchange the firm’s legal status from public to private.: h- ^0 u& z7 d% A" W) w, H
D)3 ?7 w& [" h$ @' t' n
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.
) D4 Q: I ^% {6 J) \3 ?; lQuestion:37 - 27901
. e3 _# C5 s' }0 B/ ?4 cWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?7 T+ I g% {8 w) E4 i
A): {3 k" ^/ q2 w
Political obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.$ W. A e& J1 p$ N
B)
9 D+ g6 z: Z8 i# C2 R/ gManagement can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures., F% M' \( d7 M' c2 I, O
C), f$ W& y, o: O% C- B
The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.
! ~- e- s N, e+ ^5 I" T9 DD)6 w4 b. H8 Q; R
The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.3 S8 b* A" a8 F2 p
7 S% a" G8 U+ |" k: O P% ^
Question:38 - 9865
5 a2 }4 \1 ^; K# Q/ K! KOverestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:
. \+ Y! s o% Q0 ]/ W% }% [A), C- Y# A! K0 d. z& A) t
too low.- I) ^0 M* ?9 Q7 U& N
B)6 @. ^( O% Y+ Q" k d6 D/ O y
can't tell from this information.( r, R7 ?' [1 f& V9 |, H
C)
) H9 p+ \3 E( ^8 O7 w5 @7 Ptoo high.; X0 B Y6 H6 ^, ^! N1 w& t$ _
D)
/ J W* ^0 w5 T# m9 E5 N/ @very accurate.
! Y5 `! N; [% N8 U* Q' n
" b6 O9 T; v8 q _, ~$ B3 A) R. Y4 a$ y
Question:39 - 9849' g5 `& @" t7 S) l! }5 f
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
H7 |% A$ n8 l( f4 RA), i0 e0 U, w. l" I% h7 H' v K
relative value.
- F" Z, H; K& m4 OB)# g( `9 L8 t* n5 i; M! B
future value.: q* D% B/ r- P& P- R1 S
C)' C) R7 o# ]. u) ^
intrinsic value.
- q# T7 m+ \* F* @6 I( d+ I ^D)
# W9 X1 l8 {* \' a9 I2 g# I9 @market value.+ ]4 \3 ]1 D/ I5 `: J$ w8 j
( V2 |$ h; z) u9 }) C( L4 Z+ n
Question:40 - 9947
: I8 D/ `# _: LRoger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?
[0 y6 y( S( o I4 b) o# eA)0 ? e6 w* T+ z& h' Y& X! g9 J4 t
An 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.6 [ g$ e; q& o" N5 ^( E
B)" {/ O r2 Q: M0 F) D8 o
An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.+ _9 m+ ]7 j5 ~) ]0 L$ I3 Z
C)) C7 I, l' d$ |( b- z; r+ g
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.
/ R" {) [& f# q( i: DD)* r- c9 q8 `9 k; a1 _, @ A$ m
The market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
! d" Z/ V. b1 j: ?5 G6 X |
|