|
Question:36 - 27854! y. {) u0 I; v$ S7 \8 k
Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:/ {( v! I5 F3 S+ z
A); f7 s( p9 g5 M2 I. z
provide managers greater job security., D2 L9 _% x* i8 O+ q
B)
7 G* e+ C. k8 K* Y- ymay start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.
, T3 } m. G( _C)
3 W1 O/ v+ a4 W: P( U$ Y! _change the firm’s legal status from public to private.
$ m! j" S u( u2 t4 H& OD)3 } j: P( k) y; E) ^
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.6 t- m$ H6 Y; Z0 c4 S8 `& }
Question:37 - 27901- e0 k+ w3 S8 S5 T: d) I
Which of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
* ?' o1 B& e, T$ V7 p. N& F- p; `A)
( P& P; ^8 n2 MPolitical obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources. J+ r) |; u9 o# N I3 R
B); b( g4 O% R/ M' Q1 p6 i
Management can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.
* d. H) v' t+ |* V# KC)3 |# F/ m. ]" E ]9 _0 j5 v; ]
The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.
; X( N$ g7 { _9 J# hD): b* v8 N3 T+ H8 ^
The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets., |! g: w5 [* Q t6 g* ~9 B
3 h' `$ _; A+ t- Q2 o+ l
Question:38 - 9865
# s- g( `2 i! M! EOverestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:
# l4 [# l4 A. I; F T$ GA)8 o$ h ?0 b0 F$ g& b8 W& x- F- g
too low.( W; g# H! K4 I* L4 l) @
B)$ A9 P6 f* s/ @1 b% o# t, _' x
can't tell from this information.
: }) b. p& O# [) D$ f5 dC)
# S9 X2 l. P) F- k' wtoo high.
F% D/ y& s7 g C( I3 sD)/ J, Y. t4 F' f6 `5 o
very accurate.- ] h/ T; K! Y" |# N% f
t& f m# c: [4 a, R8 f
1 _. v6 G* ?! A4 B# q5 aQuestion:39 - 98497 P Q- Z* B. M' x5 H( [8 Z
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:( V& g4 ?4 T& ?# e, [+ ]! R
A)
% r% t# v" i; z; |' M' {' t& drelative value.6 g( o8 \2 Q; N/ T/ T8 H
B)1 }3 }' E; b: p/ G
future value.
+ F8 H! m9 q3 J+ F& N, F' oC)
+ x% ]/ f+ w- o4 ^6 R& {3 _2 W; G) fintrinsic value.
6 n8 Q% w* R! `$ TD); n Q6 h* ~2 ^7 C5 N
market value.+ `4 z8 S. E! w; T2 r! f: f3 p# {
; q! X4 B4 u: T H) U- Z
Question:40 - 9947
, w u! i+ p, i$ |Roger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?
: Q. E. N4 [3 E8 l: p. }A)
. E3 W9 h1 ?( ?4 s* g3 {3 k# sAn 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
. j9 {- p W" ZB)& a5 K1 M1 [, A5 t/ m' ?! J4 H
An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
- b- [+ o+ X% u$ H, BC)7 Q5 v6 Y; g; D* Q* j6 ?5 S. P' ^
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.
: x# m* q# j! s2 R; kD)& @4 D* m3 t" s$ ^: c4 u; U
The market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
6 K4 K8 K& ]/ c0 }7 X, G9 D: h |
|