|
|
Question:36 - 27854
) f/ U% S; Q3 G2 C- q7 LWhich of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:
2 x# J" G& h6 QA)
4 Y9 n9 {6 `1 r& y( e+ Z( r' jprovide managers greater job security.( j- u/ V; i- z( n
B); n* D2 ?, \5 y( M
may start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.
0 `7 k1 v& t0 s; R# p9 JC)- h; U& J' X/ X7 n3 `8 v
change the firm’s legal status from public to private.2 O, b; U8 X4 m, u- L8 ~% {3 j* U8 g
D)
" d, M4 j! q7 E9 p" v, iforce the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors. g! P5 a; K9 o) o, m5 ]
Question:37 - 27901
& I+ \ S# f- |- x. rWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
: ?0 [/ \3 U" GA)! p, z. ?3 Y) m& k
Political obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.* [1 T& I4 s/ M
B)
& s& ]0 j: z% s# ?Management can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures., B+ @1 f6 a: C. w' `1 |
C)
* ^2 v( u: Z# r0 xThe firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.! q! v. O4 Q4 }! a5 _( P
D)
) B' S2 w# r5 B+ i7 [0 z1 kThe firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.- _, r. B# _0 b; s( T3 x) L# G1 `) B
$ n0 w d3 h1 C( \" s; b4 Z; B2 |9 d
Question:38 - 98651 V) |3 E/ ~% o3 i3 n" E
Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:
/ d7 |6 V0 t5 [8 C4 a& p+ E) v1 Q* z' vA)& M9 C4 a1 n( j# b
too low./ h+ t' b: A! b( ~5 `9 q
B)' `+ o7 B5 T: H3 O
can't tell from this information." T* l: I$ b5 F" c
C)
$ L9 n: R# l) Y$ U. d$ Ytoo high.
6 x4 b) b8 |0 |! WD)7 g) P3 ^$ Z8 [
very accurate.
: l1 K# ^8 P) F; D4 w
8 t$ `: g, U$ h+ P1 v; J5 x. K2 W- c
Question:39 - 9849
. q3 Y5 b; u, |! N) W1 HThe goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:( Z3 O" H+ Q! S! \, s4 S
A)
" x t: ~3 D; H9 X# @7 [relative value.
8 e' o4 n9 f1 `" {% O0 t2 U5 JB), N' I/ u2 L- b* f; Q/ ^
future value.
. F3 _$ a; n0 _) S% N! a9 nC)
$ `) S' h: i7 B5 ^* ^. @1 [- Zintrinsic value.
9 M, w0 b5 _9 ED)
4 A3 g- Z% |& Q# E& umarket value.# K- F& y3 O6 E2 ]5 c1 ^7 r* T1 l5 ?& R
) }$ C# T, [# y1 ]1 o8 V
Question:40 - 9947
% G# z$ C B$ Q8 |. U) DRoger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?
; ~$ v$ \3 @/ S, }A)
+ ]7 R6 @6 l' m; F, Z& {7 b& ~+ KAn 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
, C0 f& x% C0 i9 R1 ^B)5 r9 W- G7 U2 M3 ?4 l# ~2 Z
An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.# k9 F. R3 K& G
C)9 N0 _3 E' N$ B2 D }* z
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.1 W8 `5 v/ }( n2 C% `# S
D)
\* D% ]! d) [4 @+ h1 bThe market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
3 W) ~7 z q2 {3 s$ l8 K |
|