|
|
Question:36 - 27854
+ }+ s0 K# N; B8 @" p0 z, [Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:' T) Z7 o3 H! K6 i
A)
6 [: G7 O; H4 ^3 u& }$ p F2 Eprovide managers greater job security.
0 Y, m, v0 X% h# iB)( {4 c" ~- U4 t! D; k
may start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.
( \ c" h! ~; C, [C)% B2 ?, \ v- J5 ^1 X* b4 }
change the firm’s legal status from public to private.3 M0 e; J7 F" m8 w$ {
D)/ H4 w+ A; ^$ g7 z; e: l; o+ @! l
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors./ S; d- D* e, L0 v. @
Question:37 - 27901( |5 B% ^, r4 x5 q: t
Which of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
7 J6 x6 {8 Q& E A4 |A)
2 G# Y& C: N5 YPolitical obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.
' G+ t& j3 L) Z: l# t& L SB)- \9 O( v; q, m9 A& l7 \5 p, \
Management can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.
- `, _0 i# h- g1 |% |, Q7 z: r" gC)7 R6 r7 j. x8 V( N
The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.
1 P3 n1 F i* T( j( ]2 p6 n% ~D)8 @; U2 C' e% W
The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.2 e% }' k* Q0 ^; N- c) D
- Q. P+ I2 g+ B/ x4 `: k# p8 _Question:38 - 9865
0 g7 v! h r% y0 T$ U fOverestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:
$ T F. l, p" nA)( A2 R' a8 v- i; Z7 [# M
too low.
' B/ Z* [' V3 Z' BB)
1 Z" I- R3 D( d3 }3 M8 ecan't tell from this information.
, ?) f+ }- k3 @; o3 l7 N0 K7 _7 ]C)
, `: p( ?7 W" I5 F6 {1 Q# U( c4 ftoo high.
4 X" R! D% ?$ l6 b+ T: W8 w+ X; }D)
& _& s o3 C' {& J! T* F+ w9 Rvery accurate.
' p5 v& T( t |
* \+ e5 {5 C4 ~2 d. K
" d( [8 W' h# I7 ?6 ^! ?Question:39 - 9849" M# j" D [/ i
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:& N. Y5 o8 p. _+ w0 B: F+ M+ U5 W
A)
: U1 O0 j' j0 h3 g9 o3 irelative value.
# X3 A1 `( ]' M( K/ ZB)1 u+ X i4 k9 s- G
future value.4 J( V; N) [* o, T
C)
, g1 j" j6 ^) j& S; x7 s" {4 ]intrinsic value.- x6 q" I6 C. q% B
D)
4 f+ I! J0 E+ P9 i* N5 f0 q" x2 rmarket value.
- k* [8 E" f- j& M) w; t8 l& K/ Y8 V2 B8 c8 `: ~( r8 k! W! m: u
Question:40 - 99471 M$ j* [4 F' f, a" L+ H: V
Roger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?
4 E. ]/ A& K" B! t7 i' VA)% F8 ~# `6 D& x9 Z# E, z* `2 W
An 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.2 p9 B0 P2 e# q' S) z! \3 R$ g8 M
B)
) A. u# X+ A$ i2 T" V2 y; iAn 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
+ y) N: Y0 w5 ^" U- SC)3 ~0 c- ]2 p7 q
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.; P; h2 O9 q- H% n1 z
D)& D, M. a. \4 W" g
The market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.) p* H# Z5 ] X6 z+ Y
|
|