|
|
Question:36 - 278540 E- m, | z, f/ Y
Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:) g6 n4 l: f- f! h1 V/ J
A)
' m: R6 v- u* q% x1 yprovide managers greater job security.
+ w$ G" I, p" v8 J' @, ?B)( r# g3 r: U( }5 L! h& q
may start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.
* m0 z: _# L* k: f2 |) x" B( XC)
8 Y" }3 Q& C% R" Ychange the firm’s legal status from public to private.
/ i; B) @; J7 w0 F3 ~6 k) `: ED)+ D; A' a Y* Z& X1 j7 g
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.. B) ?+ `# h. I
Question:37 - 279010 Q( M |$ E9 I1 T/ a
Which of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
5 j, L& A6 c: ^( z3 dA)- x) P) W; K; ?; j6 n( c4 N
Political obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.
$ R' w( s2 O% m9 z+ {& n, ^6 [! uB)
3 Y6 v0 M( J# F; y$ XManagement can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.
5 x2 e- W$ K9 d) h. NC)
% V. W* Q; d1 A8 e# t$ AThe firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.
4 I7 }6 G7 j) |: E! s, \! ?D)
4 y; z8 G2 ~0 k( |) [2 mThe firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.( q! ~. z T1 A0 y
& ?4 ^% @" G* j }$ H, j( v' ]- CQuestion:38 - 9865/ R# c, z% D6 c% u* \8 [% O
Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:4 ]/ N8 w# n) z3 W0 `- _
A)" S$ P' U6 n- Q5 h- g
too low.
0 R8 ?; V2 y" z; |& q& JB)& r5 W5 S7 ^ C
can't tell from this information.
4 O. o: S' Q. y( M. ]& \& Z/ CC)( J& d. R7 I5 ?3 \( q, D& x
too high.
3 V Z/ g: m& t7 c0 dD)
5 _0 [: h0 ?$ O- H- V! Yvery accurate.: \- _2 C) ~, g
# a6 [) ^ n1 H" H' L: _. U
! y8 @/ u4 S9 n+ F$ B& [# KQuestion:39 - 98499 g, K8 A% I: ?; B- R$ x9 r3 ~) S
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:( }. D2 o; v e6 \. p, s) O6 ~
A)
9 p9 L5 {: e2 H0 Orelative value., e* _. h5 _, c' P/ h+ ?
B)
* y5 D# k0 h: q7 c2 h7 a' Mfuture value.# D. U7 r7 f5 f/ v* N! e0 W% g8 i
C)' ^: n. N! P. E2 m0 K: D
intrinsic value., q+ m7 k* `- g: w: L9 j
D)4 G0 y) f) ?0 W( i
market value.
) W, t, H: k( v; M4 Q- k& p2 ?2 z6 n7 ?
4 _. \' {. C' F1 ]Question:40 - 9947& C' O" C: n/ u$ R/ W( x
Roger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?
5 N$ z& b- V/ T9 |9 S) vA)$ K7 y2 ?# Y6 |+ r7 p
An 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
' a. E3 P5 z$ n! w; N; A v/ ?B)' l9 @- v# B% }& d- t" V5 @' ]
An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.7 ^" I1 a9 z, n; h5 z% u
C)
' O& w3 [/ i! U- a/ K/ i$ v' O4 fMarket share goals are not a competitive strategy.
; }. Q4 h6 V% A7 G1 FD)
) _' o0 `, ?1 YThe market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
, ^3 W* K5 ~' { |
|