|
|
Question:36 - 27854) V H2 V1 K6 z2 u6 \$ x8 [& T
Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:, ]1 c% c, \1 F' v- _! v
A)
" Q, R( k5 ]1 {; D8 D0 K% x. Z2 rprovide managers greater job security.
+ E0 O) v" l( b! R' yB)
. E. v4 J' N2 f8 smay start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.
. Y- Y0 D2 W. WC)
4 D: N$ g M# [( p, h7 q7 |change the firm’s legal status from public to private., }, g- I, n8 n E5 O
D)/ O: G: m1 K5 c9 E i o
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.8 g. h3 v. N4 @% t1 s
Question:37 - 27901
X5 V8 q& n: n# o, t1 j* |* nWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
" m& y' J: W, C5 GA)
, j0 V% \( N9 P; V/ V& I& J' gPolitical obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.
7 T F$ h3 N6 lB) ]( H0 e) K0 ?" z1 `. Z
Management can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.# Y: |7 X9 ~2 t9 R
C)
' b9 h# i, X/ Q0 I+ k2 t0 ^The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures./ H# M/ x5 l2 m7 \6 s# l, t$ O
D)2 W) u' ~$ H; k+ ~* S/ u. Q2 C: b
The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.& \- R( s/ w5 z1 c3 P
+ t% T* u1 K" t0 @1 E( A
Question:38 - 9865 P5 b% [5 L8 M. ^' X3 m
Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:, a) [( Y1 F" n. H$ Z& [
A)
* y, k0 j8 K K+ Ttoo low.
% f' p% i8 ]9 DB)
/ k, K1 T2 F# H) t) b6 x1 ?/ {$ h5 pcan't tell from this information.
& W+ t" |/ s, Y/ A$ wC)1 x4 ~3 V7 w. S9 V0 M
too high.
1 y. A* q; C4 L- M0 l+ D: fD)! w2 l' p3 W' M. |9 `
very accurate.* F2 j3 V# ~) s6 _5 d
, Z' z7 i. L$ w2 y( t8 q5 `6 E" _; m" Q: F I! A- k) z4 ?" s$ K
Question:39 - 98493 D `% n! e* s$ @
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:) M3 x" H+ A7 l4 _1 K# i! X* X" m
A)
& F7 B/ v& z1 N! H Lrelative value.
4 p r9 a4 x" z0 ~# B }2 N. CB)& |7 R7 N' {* {
future value.+ i: F, c! x! ]7 s' g# x: b: j
C)# @& A0 w" M5 D- Y* N5 C6 o2 k
intrinsic value.! F& \1 v0 w7 i: s
D) s3 X! b) e- R+ G# n7 _
market value.
+ F0 }' M1 \9 U( v0 U# `& h6 i( F" ]+ ^, I
Question:40 - 9947% ^- D q) K: [% o% n
Roger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?8 U% b h, c2 r; Y" ?; \2 \8 [
A)
( S1 H4 i% t- J+ C, Z9 wAn 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
5 A5 S7 F! \0 r* [/ W0 aB)
1 p* ]9 o2 R' |' XAn 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
" ]+ G% o6 n; z' z% r+ i$ h! Y9 TC)+ V2 R7 j: r$ z% t; p
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.
7 o' L3 {! n/ d# |# UD)2 G3 t' N' a J
The market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
# Q3 O$ i* e5 d% r |
|