|
|
Question:36 - 27854
6 B+ M* y! z) w3 ZWhich of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:3 f' C ], J+ l* \1 [
A)% b2 R* b" _8 T9 n
provide managers greater job security.
. B' U/ T$ C, x8 G0 D% c: X; nB)
$ |4 b$ C" ]/ l6 W2 Q+ r+ {& K5 smay start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.! F0 J9 C: i4 t, V, n) ?2 O
C): o" c9 R2 b" @
change the firm’s legal status from public to private.
& S4 p$ E8 o9 h3 @1 B9 `: ?D)
0 Q2 k0 _/ `4 _# P+ Z, @force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.
3 H. Y% T4 G, g5 j% B! vQuestion:37 - 27901
3 T- @. Z F5 ], K, H: [; LWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?' W5 S- a* g& ]6 M- {" A1 a
A)
! q0 ~8 m2 v9 e4 Q/ s8 I, U4 H, jPolitical obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.
* y2 i5 k$ R) F0 }1 I* N3 b; jB)
6 Y$ J0 Y) O" ^) W, fManagement can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.
/ k( j7 _) p- bC)
/ R& ^0 \4 A- u2 r2 \& l( rThe firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures. i( k) C0 x: P" |' P5 i
D)
) B; s* f% _. i6 g% O9 R/ n5 M: |The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.; L! W" `: G1 u; C
6 P4 P9 w+ [/ o |# ~Question:38 - 98651 J' e R* U8 Q7 `
Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:% i& _% C3 S5 W$ t; {7 @
A)
4 |/ f p3 g1 g/ ?4 g$ c3 }. Ttoo low.
3 }5 b9 q& N% c( B' NB)
) E" n; ^1 a. p& a0 _: Zcan't tell from this information.
8 l" A4 J) ~+ d9 eC)7 Z) k$ z& m2 @9 Z
too high.
- ?5 N( Y4 X; p/ T3 o0 G3 o% aD)
& n5 b" `8 R9 G) @6 N. ?very accurate.
6 I1 p0 y; @8 i" y0 @ z9 n0 q( b* `' ` F; m- M
+ T4 v ~4 W) L! E k2 ]
Question:39 - 98495 r+ K* S) v4 B% p C$ }1 m
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
% F* v% k6 w0 j5 _/ C0 {" D8 l) wA)
2 N' U O3 I' y, B" T* {8 zrelative value.: p j, I2 q; u' ^5 M5 `& ^. M8 H
B)- k* t7 j* t' o. t0 `! j" |
future value.5 l, h; z# j) V" M1 d Z' x: N
C)
: p# R; ? T5 u3 A2 Qintrinsic value.
$ K3 d' c G) V# KD)
# |0 y. @: b; @3 `. V% m# v3 [market value.; B. b% F3 A7 r! C% E7 V8 O- u- n( ^7 f
3 x2 H/ o, ?! h2 b* S
Question:40 - 9947+ C6 a' w F, F
Roger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?
9 L2 f: V7 F* c5 B7 O3 M7 LA)$ a( Z' l# }+ E9 X0 ]0 T* a0 \& N
An 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
9 b$ ?6 e( u4 V- f5 o, SB)$ o( _# A; d) B# P3 L
An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
" U! H2 j1 |2 sC)+ z! a! h: i* d( N
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.- b( t* \, \2 V( q/ z1 `: b
D)
{- T6 o# G* ?* D, Y! L% M% aThe market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.) d/ k& o9 }% u: B/ x. I* m0 F
|
|