|
|
Question:36 - 27854* w! I4 n: O1 P6 n3 r8 e+ Q
Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:
7 R: c+ @ { |0 p9 z. GA) n4 h9 s9 D. d
provide managers greater job security.
$ [2 r9 d% R$ H3 t! Z, I( eB)3 F$ J9 x7 t) j" w
may start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.( H L. Y: A/ D& z& a( l& U+ y5 i( B
C)3 g+ [) I) K2 D. g6 y) m" h
change the firm’s legal status from public to private.$ R* H' C% `; ^& M! z* B
D)% }9 T4 u+ A! L% r5 ^9 Z
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.
- Y) a" ~7 J3 q0 q, y! | i/ mQuestion:37 - 27901
5 D: o9 u4 F% j; ZWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?% D4 Q" Y( h% s
A)
+ U( Q9 Q- B& q' w$ b$ jPolitical obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.
8 F7 E8 q* M" s% R9 f) J+ q# yB)
6 W4 S. l& E3 z% V" y) E1 oManagement can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.
7 n3 B5 y5 g5 m- t9 {1 NC)
, z/ }9 v, | N. c8 a7 SThe firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.4 F8 W' |- t6 p2 `5 m
D)
) }+ @7 m Q* wThe firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.
+ q) d0 v4 ^0 F9 Q @% ]1 R: g/ z s! T* H7 l& A; @! L4 q
Question:38 - 9865
6 M8 \& A2 n3 a# g- ]Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:6 C i- m) |4 R! v
A)
! v$ N# C( Z: G3 u jtoo low.0 o) s/ P( O) ?! q7 m( |% q+ `
B)
% |! P7 Y0 D1 W% Y) _, jcan't tell from this information.
. l& j8 i6 H' }) B) m# i" ?+ ZC)
8 y6 }& [& _- @too high.
+ [' y" _1 ^, j3 c/ N# r5 U) KD)
0 w( e) d0 c% Z7 P9 ~very accurate.
2 Q& w# I" V' N" V6 x) R8 j% n" t% Y
2 U0 H* T5 _0 n) { e2 x$ P# Z7 AQuestion:39 - 9849) v4 P1 C* `* f8 W
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:+ L$ K& ^% F/ h" v. q/ A$ k5 G: O
A)! N! h3 @3 A8 Q6 @
relative value.* `4 |! i2 p& B
B)
# g3 w$ \& W; C& W7 efuture value.
0 H( T; t1 h* V5 _& ?$ }* \C)' H+ d2 `' m$ R, F1 x, u
intrinsic value.
- K2 H9 y, d+ _9 A/ N" WD)
$ o: R. b7 }- Z* S# Dmarket value.
7 @! F L+ }) a. }1 N0 b* ?4 c. T& P7 [6 ^& k5 o9 I2 k p! \ l
Question:40 - 99472 ?' u' a3 b. t* u5 c7 C* b" E, R) V
Roger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?2 L; |6 S- p2 D) Z% R+ ^; p$ D2 L
A): g6 E6 [, s4 J. h
An 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
' b; ~5 Y$ {0 t0 p) \; ~ WB)! L9 T, P0 z# W* \ j5 G
An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.4 T1 ?. B* U* Q% H, @ n
C); J8 h4 [5 B7 O# k% q
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.
& D& m+ c, w! B' jD)" D8 D: H" t: V" g# }; r# X
The market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
* w- U/ U7 g' }' T& H |
|