|
Question:36 - 27854
2 t) p- v. Q# E2 R9 ?' k2 `* b: Z' _Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:
; q7 ]" x2 a) x, M rA)
# P" X3 l) I7 d2 N; \$ R# Fprovide managers greater job security.9 j9 ^! y: @0 _ a
B)
' l/ Z- ?# z$ c" g1 u0 p9 amay start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.4 S4 d; I: D( _% M+ a2 |# F
C)
! V( i4 u; u! L6 ^8 \7 i2 c; }4 hchange the firm’s legal status from public to private.0 e" t- L: }% W- J. p. x# ~ h& S
D)' T7 R1 H$ F/ ~2 C
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.4 o& V/ d* c& ^$ w& u
Question:37 - 27901
3 k' j) }3 |& |$ `5 mWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
6 f& d7 h3 Y# Y0 S9 `6 s, r" ~A)
" x( z3 D3 c/ W/ kPolitical obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.
* ]; S' d3 Q3 `! [2 G+ C8 x$ LB)
& Y! U! }4 \7 \8 m9 P, V/ G( {Management can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.
8 T2 _$ P: ]- N+ H7 [2 b& RC)% |+ |4 e' U: m, D- {' c
The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.- P! N7 b1 U; P/ t; e" r" S7 R+ ~
D)
% d) s( m. J5 }% G! w* ~The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.3 e# z0 P3 r @1 h3 d
4 J. H, Y' w! ~! y9 U# c* n$ WQuestion:38 - 9865
$ t' z3 D! o4 z( u/ [( N8 Y4 rOverestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:
& E. U, G3 `1 R% N$ x( ^, ^A)4 x. ?. {) f$ G1 r) S- E
too low.
0 f* u" @3 V' m; Q9 p* ?B)
" Q$ b" M+ a1 _% ?4 }& I( g( y1 ^can't tell from this information.
5 X8 x9 u) s) W; L, Y, y# bC), N& [8 Y2 z8 ?1 Z5 _5 q8 y! `
too high.
# h8 W) Q, u) ?# l3 _/ ]D)
( N7 s# I& c g0 d( E( ~) Z, Uvery accurate.0 Q7 o8 [9 [1 h* e1 v
# @ b* H; H7 i8 L# T: Y
8 P# R) y" U' b# x
Question:39 - 98494 V. ]1 w4 J* t) W) U; P
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
3 U; B; _' {8 \" u) t; c1 B7 `9 pA)% ]7 d( I% X/ N. f' ^+ ?1 ^
relative value.
" r6 ^" [" b8 o, xB)$ m8 C1 {8 C8 G. ?% ]! N1 z3 D9 H
future value.' u& u, R1 o; f+ S! G$ f: C
C) s- v9 F0 [. |: C: T5 n
intrinsic value.
. p( U8 Z: D( ^2 ]( t8 h. P* LD)
7 V+ k3 W7 o# T' ?* X! c: D( fmarket value.
; U3 x7 E, l, R; n2 i0 s/ s& d( W% _* \8 X) T. W% x! o
Question:40 - 9947: f+ Y, e0 }4 ]1 k9 w* x: K. ^9 E
Roger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?/ |$ I" U1 p, D1 C- R& q
A)
( g) x+ ~; p( c0 k5 A% TAn 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
( ?8 o4 a! k% y4 QB)
5 M% ?' E2 H* W8 f9 Z/ k! J; SAn 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
5 |0 q {* Z8 i! t3 DC)
- N; c# z( {9 QMarket share goals are not a competitive strategy.
9 R4 Q; q. ]' ~( h+ g& |/ AD)2 p9 u8 h& |- D
The market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
) U! f- F+ }# k( Q' z. \4 J |
|