|
Question:36 - 278541 ^0 W9 ?' Y$ s. b j; j2 N
Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:
; p7 |0 _5 w7 k8 oA)
" P, K' P, L! z a0 v6 p: qprovide managers greater job security.( m3 W: _5 S" R# f
B)
0 u2 O2 O* c; L) s% t. m( `may start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.* n) Q) F* s1 c6 B' x- k# ?
C)% V1 Q2 w; _! b1 S5 B3 K# X, V
change the firm’s legal status from public to private.4 Y1 T8 Z+ o% C# O# L6 s# M
D)8 b. ^+ ?& ?" s
force the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.. W& N# K- B8 `$ ?8 ~ `' E
Question:37 - 27901
! m) C% Q- ?/ |9 U4 Q" JWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?
6 N8 C7 A- G" g+ `- Q. J2 e! u5 mA)
5 k5 q1 e1 y2 L: ~$ [. JPolitical obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.; }0 H/ ?& n6 h0 |& q5 s
B)
6 s4 d: `, S' x2 F4 v" @& aManagement can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.
) g+ X! x" O& u1 O5 WC)
3 j( {/ i, z; T- ]The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.8 r2 X- b4 e; Y
D)+ A* Y! F/ X/ Y8 M5 R f
The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.
! F' P9 {9 S0 c& Y
0 s* }) F. M9 M& \9 hQuestion:38 - 98659 U7 f. B7 p& y+ X7 R# ^& p" [
Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:
& W8 c5 d8 T+ Z1 v! ^9 r/ ]A)
1 o' [" B) M0 w0 v! Q% c8 F* b0 Xtoo low.
z0 p. Z$ i* L5 O5 g; C4 wB)
- h/ ^& G, e+ ~# ecan't tell from this information.
' o+ f [5 a& N* jC)" X+ K, w9 u" v$ X$ k& A. E1 }
too high.
/ V6 l) v1 \# `' \) E1 E) gD)
4 c* B7 g( V/ _$ |4 c4 x" gvery accurate.
2 {+ @' z( q/ q2 L1 K1 r7 p: |1 x; Y6 V8 \
1 i& j/ c& }3 kQuestion:39 - 9849( Q9 ]7 e$ Z1 t8 q/ [- w
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
- v9 L) U7 Z4 i3 j" FA)% T8 J8 d& F: J+ u! h
relative value.
5 ^/ Y- A2 R3 u: ] TB)
+ K( b' k* h- A" M( {' t& t( dfuture value.
: e# f$ c; [7 [0 G" {( _C)
/ J6 H& A: B( z; g g$ vintrinsic value., m8 z0 {" \2 |8 O
D)" S& J" w/ D; y7 \* t4 ]
market value.! @4 ~+ y8 `% y5 C5 z1 l4 q3 Y y" F
: R5 i4 E1 @" n9 ^' W1 jQuestion:40 - 9947
5 [* l: b$ O4 C$ M/ oRoger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?( N. l9 c- ~9 ?. t" {) R% k
A)( z+ o0 D5 z @+ ~6 _* O+ R S
An 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
/ s2 Y( Z! S+ C4 I4 G) TB)
( h* J4 O0 q% `3 FAn 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
9 I+ `# G; ?) Y6 [0 vC)% u/ T- b s) Z+ C( d
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.
/ z0 R8 m( c& ^D)# Y8 p1 D) h8 b8 _% i# z5 r( `
The market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.9 V9 L. z8 y4 W# V
|
|