|
|
Question:36 - 27854
9 b0 b; t% X" FWhich of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:
: g2 d. G/ L3 ?1 o# vA)
; ?$ } E0 T/ S% F* \1 B3 g2 X0 nprovide managers greater job security.
) f/ x6 R# x# o5 w3 qB): S& L% Y$ e5 e, i
may start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.
, ?9 c! j" P- I: ~9 {! ?4 _C)3 R2 s& |6 `& c
change the firm’s legal status from public to private.
( ^& T+ y. O7 L- r7 h" VD)
! A" |3 l0 F7 p/ Rforce the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.. k( j' X ], Z6 L
Question:37 - 27901
$ f1 s: w+ M5 g6 X* D0 l/ IWhich of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?- e( x- v* L# G: r C& M1 J3 d
A)
* i9 ?# a% W- o% I, {; `Political obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.' Z$ Y8 ?+ P# {4 z& {
B)
7 w# w9 X9 `9 f* w4 @ Q$ P$ YManagement can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.4 O$ J: b0 |" a3 c) H
C)8 E7 {" U- r$ T( Q* P7 k
The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.+ \9 _# I/ R I- P2 K7 G7 H
D)4 ~$ x$ v3 b* N7 A" G$ f9 |
The firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.
7 M |7 [8 @" s2 {5 z# j" N& m6 P; f2 \6 f+ P, `
Question:38 - 9865/ Z% h- f2 y+ A0 p- h
Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:+ z( m) X3 r" Q! T; M
A)
6 ?0 Y2 `$ d J. v0 n1 Z/ S Otoo low.
4 C6 `3 X0 h' Y* HB)4 y. p; J" b v0 g* e- \ z
can't tell from this information.6 N* k2 S$ ?/ n4 G2 D
C)
5 g( p6 z! Y: L. V( Ptoo high./ y: J6 \6 J7 [& L
D)& W* J& Y( a1 l7 p4 _* P
very accurate.
: q8 z; z; i! j0 _8 H4 o& _) Z4 O
% k- @2 Y0 q$ P6 U% r3 fQuestion:39 - 9849- q8 ?0 V4 b! r6 k7 ?" e! W! H, x2 L
The goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
8 u6 D1 u# A1 ^A)
( Y) \! o/ Z" c3 K) k }5 Urelative value.+ G6 O: }) `, ^: \. Y+ V
B)1 x# |) B" L5 z
future value.8 k6 ]4 `0 E7 f T5 X% z( ?
C)/ f0 T3 P' M% @" ?
intrinsic value.
' B( J1 ^, ~) y J% |% X7 t8 TD)) x" X; r) ~2 `3 Q6 _
market value.5 ^, a- ?* K. M0 k* I0 a0 V* C
]9 |: D% B& b0 uQuestion:40 - 9947
@8 e. `0 b: N0 X; Z. M2 @+ uRoger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?
+ q+ G5 o* @+ k1 K4 T' xA)
1 d: x7 A& X+ `9 O: kAn 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
- A" y, _$ B6 S- D1 ?- @B)
3 [; W% J2 P4 z) @/ yAn 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
3 `" i" y" V; i& u. P% V* c5 bC)( q/ }, E3 I1 V- @5 _0 Z1 |# q
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.* v% W2 D, }% o4 p. e, u6 }5 d; Z
D)
6 C; y- h/ @6 a. Y# XThe market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
7 X! [& \, k; J- U( ?5 ` |
|