|
|
Question:36 - 27854. C* \. e1 Z3 y" j& |
Which of the following is NOT a possible consequence of takeover defenses? Takeover defenses:
8 n: H- D" j; d9 MA)
& X. t! L; r) k& h( q& wprovide managers greater job security.
5 z! g! Z/ w0 q$ nB); }. Q! T) t4 P8 y" W7 y
may start a bidding war for the firm’s shares.1 W0 t! Q7 {( M9 F9 K9 v, `7 E
C): B. k$ F8 F; l0 u3 l
change the firm’s legal status from public to private.
: l; v* ^! q# ~. x6 XD)
- y3 Q- ~; W& ?" r' u8 q- Hforce the acquirer to negotiate directly with the firm’s Board of Directors.& C" ^: u3 i+ I, V
Question:37 - 27901 i: o5 d3 a. v
Which of the following statements regarding internal capital markets is FALSE?: b0 w& c& j% G+ \+ J
A)* q( }0 S5 `3 @5 S( {! |( v# w! U
Political obstacles are likely to exist in efficiently allocating resources.
+ O2 o. P! i3 x! ~' V$ uB), m: r5 J9 D$ Z8 j# p' |9 O9 ]
Management can channel free cash flow from mature business lines to high growth ventures.& }$ y8 F3 y: e: W
C)! f" ?& f* [4 f( \
The firm can credibly signal the quality of new ventures.
, b0 F' |# F6 I$ l, m/ p& D6 mD)
- |; F8 M. Q4 F$ g% U. tThe firm can save money by not issuing securities in the capital markets.1 A8 o7 L% U7 `' R R( E$ z3 q3 H
: J/ O0 i" L+ p- J& p3 \- n
Question:38 - 98657 [1 g4 z+ a8 z$ ~ J4 Q
Overestimating the growth rate of a firm in using a valuation model would result in a value that is likely to be:
8 O5 p8 ]6 x% l) fA)0 N# n8 ?/ w' t! I" Y1 t
too low.1 W( {$ p0 ?# @2 W" l0 @
B)
, @$ L) s2 Q0 {2 k% h+ `can't tell from this information.
; B1 _& G! Q+ P. \C)- x& a T6 N' \: E
too high.
- ~3 S1 M8 d. q2 v* N8 D" {4 ]D)( H7 w" t9 p4 a) p8 f" j
very accurate.
# N) F- A* k, g, ?* v
2 t+ ~* m& m2 [4 t$ f3 g: ^: _) H1 w6 U' I- x6 @' H* [8 e
Question:39 - 9849
+ L. n) d- D* S* T! JThe goal of asset valuation, based on the expected future cash flows of an asset, is to establish an asset’s:
3 E& U3 Z: c, k2 UA); ~! X" J, c8 n `$ {% J
relative value.
7 n6 `8 F1 x( J1 R2 x1 {2 a9 JB)
9 K+ k, _$ W: W/ Q" Cfuture value." x' ?5 R5 H q1 Y: T
C)0 C! n# {, i8 V; w: b
intrinsic value.# q3 ~8 O- q2 ?$ s$ I. I$ A9 [
D)
6 U/ o5 H! B1 x; g7 W. q! umarket value.- M- B# f/ {1 h; e5 j
# k2 J' [2 {$ e7 P" |) d3 b# ]3 S, Y1 _Question:40 - 9947
1 p0 |) b {% R! xRoger Miller is the CEO of MetaCorp. MetaCorp is attempting to implement a strategic plan to establish a sustainable competitive advantage. The main thrust of the plan is to achieve a market share of at least 18 percent. Miller hires a strategy consultant to review the plan. The consultant concludes that MetaCorp’s strategic plan is inadequate. Which of the following is a likely reason for the consultant’s conclusion?7 z: v6 N' |# E+ m
A)
2 }+ ^4 a8 ?. p' N9 R3 LAn 18 percent market share is sufficient to create a sustainable competitive advantage.& V' [' A! v& x
B)2 k) ], |8 f- |( P* B
An 18 percent market share is too large to create a sustainable competitive advantage.) E: r1 O0 F' C! W5 f' S
C)& O3 l) F. c$ s- N$ A
Market share goals are not a competitive strategy.
8 S+ v6 s, C* d, u& e3 u8 rD)7 d' {" E* u3 c. w
The market share goal must be considered in relation to the number of competitors.
! w( B( ?0 S. z* s9 E W |
|